Life science organisations are adept at running projects within their field of expertise, and usually there are a number of truisms, or ‘known knowns’ that the team will build on to meet the project goals. However, if one of the known knowns is held to be true in areas outside the core knowledge base, problems can arise! This is especially true for a complicated project that breaks new ground, where it may be easy to reapply a truism that worked in one area to another without interrogating it to check that it still applies because these ‘known knowns’ are rarely explicitly stated.
It may even be that a ‘known known’ is an organisation’s ‘point of difference’ and therefore it is politically difficult to call out that ‘while it may have been the driver for a company’s growth for the last N years, it cannot be reapplied for a new project in a different technical area because of X.’
If you have ever worked on a project where the base assumptions are wrong it can be a strange place to be. The initial hope in starting a project with its associated potential gives way to a feeling of unease. It is often easier to ignore doubts, carry on with your work and hope that the problem goes away, but assuming that something is a ‘known known’ i.e. universally true, when in fact it is only true within a range can often lead to catastrophic project failure.
What we will cover: